Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

Translation Status
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now

Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
How valid are Hadith and do they contradict the Quran?
Add Your Comments  Question by: WILLIAM On 07 December 2010
MemberID : Password: >> Forgot Id/Password
Comments by: moazzam On 07 December 2010
My dear William: You are 100% right in your claim,but there is no any way or scientific technique ,which may make understand to the dumb followers of dogmas in the religious world. If your effert is for rational thinkers then the only ALFURQAN (the most scientific laboratory ) see the verse 3/3-4,2/185 is more than enough to discreminate HAQQ from BATILL.May Allah bless you.

Comments by: Maniza On 08 December 2010
Dear William,  
You are correct, but you forget that the mullahs have conjured up the "science of hadith" to validate their hadis, every sect having their own method, thus the blind leading the blind.  
Two links for those who want to study more about hadith.

Comments by: William On 08 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Maniza,  
The "Science of Hadith" has no substance - this is a form of categorization: a manner of sorting and classifying certain statements. It is a methodology based on statements of hearsay. This could be done in the present time with posts on this very blog! The significant question arises... as part of the original validation process, were each individual Hadith compared to the Quran? (Obviously not!)  
The accounts given were not actually certified by any witnesses that are claimed to be apart of the given transmission. Therefore the value and validity of each statement becomes null and void regardless of the "Science of Hadith"  
Its as though I gathered home remedies for the flu from various locations, noted them down in a book that gets published without ever verifying its contents. None of the recopies’ have any medicinal affect on the patient whatsoever... yet millions believe it works.  

Comments by: aurangzaib On 08 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Brother William, (Sis Maniza)  
Yours is a scholarly outlook on the question of authentication of Ahaadith. It is a question of history and history always drags me towards it with an irresistible appeal.  
It is true that this collection of hearsay was never scrutinized on Government level. It was not OPENLY authenticated either. On the contrary, all historical events suggest that it was still the Government that systematically encouraged its propagation and dissemination through paid agents of the Government, the Mullas of the time, called IMAAMS. The penal code widely used by the courts under Banu Umayyad and Banu Abbas regimes, was strictly based upon injunctions of Ahaadith and the Jurisprudence of the four Imams of Fiqhi schools of thought.  
There were, however, some scholars who in their personal capacity carried out detailed investigation, probing, rejection and condemnations. Those Scholars are called “A’imma e Jirah o Ta’deel”. Since Ahaadith were collected from narrators, so the antecedents and credibility of narrators were put to strict scrutiny. The results were not unexpected. Most of those investigated proved to be of weak credibility, out right liars, imposters, characterless persons, felons, foreign affiliates, fabricators, frauds, intriguers, etc. There is a whole array of legal terminology used about them in those times.  
You would certainly like to know some of the names of those remarkable investigators.  
In the Age of Companions and the first generation of their Successors:  
In the Middle of 2nd century AH:  
IMAM A’MUSH, IMAM MAALIK, etc. started investigating the narrators of weak credibility. Then MOAMMAR, HISHAM WASTOWAAI, IMAM OWZAAI, SUFYAAN THURI, IBN AL-MAJISHOON, HAMAAD BIN SALAMAH, etc. continued the work.  
After that, IMAM YAHYA BIN SAEED AL-QATTAN (D.198 AH) and IBN AL-MAHDI were widely recognized as authorities in this field.  
In the 3rd century AH:  
Writing of books on this subject mainly started in this century. The most prominent personalities of that period are two : IMAM YAHYA BIN MOEEN (d. 233 AH) and IMAM AHMED BIN HAMBAL (d. 241 AH).  
Afterwards, this work expanded widely. Hundreds of Imams in the art of JIRAH-O-TA’DEEL (Investigation and Rationalization) surfaced, and thousands of books were written.  
But look at the tragedy! None of the big names above are known to have appointed Quran as the CRITERION for ascertaining the truth, or otherwise, of Ahaadith. Their main focus of attention unfortunately was the character and antecedents of narrators. They did establish some principles for authentication of Hadith called “USOOL-E-HADITH” which, in practice, were not actually acted upon. Had they been properly acted upon, all the books of Ahadith would actually have disappeared from the scene. You might like to know what these principles are :-  
1. Hadith should not be opposed to nature.  
2. Hadith should not be opposed to rationality.  
3. Hadith should not be opposed to Quran.  
4. Hadith should not be opposed to History.  
5. It should not be against the normal routine phenomena.  
6. It should not be from a Raafzi (Shi’ite) reporting in condemnation of Khaarijis, Companions or (in praise of) Ahl-e-Bayit.  
7. It should neither promise great rewards for actions of minute nature, not should it warn of terrible torment for minor sins.  
8. It should not be a story, although conforming to common observations, but being reported by only one person.  
Unfortunately all “authentic” books of Ahadith stand in blatant violation of above Usool-e-Hadith.  
Thank you.  

Comments by: moazzam On 08 December 2010
Dear brother Aurangzaib: regards, If AHADITH followers might observed their own established ONLY THREE " USOOL-E-HADITH,as you mentioned in your post,that " 1. Hadith should not be opposed to nature.  
2. Hadith should not be opposed to rationality.  
3. Hadith should not be opposed to Quran.>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>you are 100% right in your prediction, that, all the books of Ahadith would actually have disappeared from the scene.  
We proud to be the 1st one, to act upon at these three usool-e-hadith, as a THREE IN ONE, that is "THE HADITH SHOULD NOT BE OPPOSED TO QURAN" therefore, all the stuff (ahadith books) has been disappeared from our scene  

Comments by: aurangzaib On 08 December 2010Report Abuse
Dear Brother Moazzam,  
Very true indeed. Hadith owes its existence to the royal patronage of that time. It served their purpose well. Till date, it shields the atrocities of despotic rulers and their lackeys, the Mullas. How amazing! How identical it is to the history of the Church and the Royalty in the Christendom.

Comments by: Maniza On 09 December 2010
Dear William,  
of course I know there is no such thing as "science of hadith" other wise I would not be here :) u miss understood my post.

Comments by: William On 15 December 2010Report Abuse
Hi Maniza,  
Apologies, I think I may have gotten the wrong end of the stick...  
My post was just a suggested response that could be used if mullahs ask “why Hadith are not credible, when the science of Hadith demonstrates authenticity”.  

Comments by: Iqra07 On 09 July 2014Report Abuse
This is a complex question. Are hadith valid ? well some of them are and some are not. Some are graded as weak or unreliable , others are rated as good and others rated as very strong.  
It is important to remember that the Prophet Muhammad (saws) lived in a day and time where literacy was extremely low. Most people could not read and write and so there was a strong oral tradition. This is how history was recorded and passed down. This is still evident today. Just look at how the Arabs name themselves. Abu (father ) of such and such Ibn (son of ) thus and so. They can often trace back their lineage for not only decades but sometimes centuries because they include the names of their ancestors in their own names.  
HADITH IS NOT SCRIPTURE. It is history usually history pertaining to the Prophet Muhammad (saws). It is a historical record of things he said and did. The fact that much of it was either not written down or at least not collected into books for a couple of centuries doesn't make it any different than the rest of the history we have from that period.  
Sure there are some things that are myth or legend or exaggerated but most of the hadith rated as sahih or mutawatir are not only plausibly believable but were witnessed by lots of people. The mutawatir rating , for instance, is only attained by having some 50 reliable chains of narration or more. That's nothing to sneeze at.  
In any case , due to the fact that we know the Qur'an is perfect while hadith is not, any hadith which contradict the Qur'an should be ignored /discarded. And Allah knows best

Comments by: burberrie On 14 July 2014Report Abuse
dear Iqra07,  
How do you know that Qur'an is perfect?  

Comments by: Damon On 15 July 2014Report Abuse
I beg your pardon Sir, but this is not a complex question at all. The ahadith are 100% invalid.  
Mr. Bukhari embarked upon a journey to find a VERY SMALL HANDFUL of people to record his ahadith from. So the question is WHY did he have to travel so FAR AND WIDE to find those small, minute, handful of people from whom to listen to ahadith? The answer for me is obvious; because ahadith were NOT a part of The Islamic Program of Socio-Political reform. That is why he had to FIND those handful of people to get his ahadith from.  
Also, according to the history, Mr. Bukhari came approximately 200 years AFTER The Rasul of Islam left The Qur'an with the 6th Century Arabians. That is 200 years. So here is another question to ask: WHAT were the people reading and following for 200 long years BEFORE Mr. Bukhari (The Persian) came along with this hadith business?  
Bottom Line; If the ahadith were important and were meant to be an integral part of the Islamic Agenda then the people would not have went 200 long years without them and there would have been more than a handful of people who "supposedly" knew ahadith. I deliberately put the word "supposedly" in quotation marks because in all actuality Mr. Bukhari (The Persian) did not collect a single hadith; he concocted them and got the backing of the corrupt Abbasid Empire to IMPOSE these ahadith on the people against their will. The punishment for rejecting ahadith (just as it is today) range from ridicule to death!!  

Comments by: moazzam On 23 July 2014
Iqra07! remember the history is always biased. neither blindly-believes in Quran nor blindly deny the Ahadith or any personal quote, each and every claim must be analyzed on rational grounds. Results speaks, so we take the truth and nature as an absolute authority being the criteria to judge right from wrong.  
we rejected so called Islamic holy history (ahadith) because these are self contradictory, contradictory with quran and contradictory with nature as well, thus not come up to the merit as given criteria, whereas we accept Quran as an absolute standard because we see it in phase with nature.

Comments by: bkanwar2 On 31 July 2014 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
"How valid are Hadith and do they contradict the Quran?"  
Do Hadith contradict Quran? Which Quran? The one everyone knows as Quran? It is all hadith based, as the current understanding of Quran, which is the translation is done based upon hadith.  
The text above which no body understands, is the real Quran.  
The real Quranic text contradicts all Hadith and its own current understanding and translation based upon Hadith by just one word.  
Allah meaning "One who is not at all a deity for worship".  
Isn't all hadiths and hadith based current Quranic understanding revolves around supporting: Allah as the one and only deity for worship?  

Was Muhammad (pbuh) given revelation more than the Quran (surah:shura:51-52) (surah Al-Nisaa:163) ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 06/03/2010
was zaid adopted son of muhammad(s)? did muhammad(s) really married zainab,his adopted son's wife?also cite the reference of FABRICATED HADITH that say zainab was changing clothes and muhammad(s) saw her and fell in love with her Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/07/2010
I have heard some Mullah that hadith was not written 250 year after the demise of prophet.but hadith were there even 100 years before it right?i think there is something wrong. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/08/2010
Dear dr qamar sahib and brother aurangzaib what is the reality of SAHIFA e SADIQA of omer bin al'as by which the hadith lovers prove that hadith writing was started in the life time of the prophet muhammd? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/09/2010
99 names of Allah ? we need 3 moore, coz look at the Zorostrians :-O Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 02/10/2010
It just Resemble "Muqaam-e-Hadees" of Mr.Perwaiz. Any how partially good effort. My observations:- Mr.Ameen Hassan was follower of Mr.Maududi, Goth Machi resolution separated them both have same thoughts. MuqaameHadees" should have not been refered. Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/12/2010
I want to know what efforts are being taken by the real scholars of Al-Quran ,to enforce the teachings of Allah's kalam in the 'Madarsa'? How can we make the students of madarsa, to know the reality of 'Muqame Hadith' in Islamic literature? Question by: shakir azim On 11/12/2010
Dear Dr. Sb. As salam. Sir I know the concept of Atiullah wa atiur-raool but. dr. sb quran ki rooh se koi aisi majboot daleel dijiye jisse bat nikhar ke samne aa jaye aur ham Tableeg kar sake. Question by: On 10/02/2011,Meri bat ahle-e-hadis walo se chal rahi hai. wo kahte hai ki " Tumhari Biwi aur tumme hamne(Allah)ne rahmat dal di: 64/14 " Tumahrai baaz biwi tumhari dushman hai" 30/21 . ye tazad mitaye pls. Fahem se nahi quran ki aayat se. Question by: On 10/02/2011
A.O.A: I want to ask question that if we reject the mojzat than how will we admit that a person who is claming to become a nabi is actually a nabi? Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 05/03/2011
English Translation of 'Haqiqat e Hadith' is now available for downloading. Download Question by: Adnan From PAKISTAN On 10/06/2011
Assalam, I would like to know if Bukhori's and the rest are not reliable, then which sayings of Muhammad (SAW) can we rely? Muhammad (SAW) sure gave his speech everyday here and there and a lot of people heard and recorded it somehow. Question by: Yaid From MALAYSIA (KUALA LUMPUR) On 20/07/2013
soore mursalat me shuruki ayat me peghame tarseel ka zikr hai. so agar mursalt ka matlab pegham rasani hoga to telecommucation bhi to uski ek shakal he jo electromagnetic waves ke anjam pa raha he .to kya aj allah ka wada savh nahi hua ? Question by: mohd yahya From INDIA (BHOPAL) On 01/11/2013
salam every one can some one tell me who these Mullahs are?( aastana the conspiracy) they call us atheists. DO they know the meaning of atheist ? Question by: kanju swat From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 23/02/2016
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved