Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
BOOKS
HAQIQAT E HADITH
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
A.O.A: I want to ask question that if we reject the mojzat than how will we admit that a person who is claming to become a nabi is actually a nabi?
Add Your Comments  Question by: ALI.HAIDEER On 05 March 2011
Comments by: ali.haideer On 05 March 2011Report Abuse
This whole system of nabowat and risalat seems to be very illogical and it raises many questions in our mind particularly in those who want to understand THE RELIGION. Than the question arises that if a person claims whether he was in past or even today that he is a nabi and he receives wahe(i dont want to go in the details of wahe here)or says ALLAH says this to me etc........why will we believe him????? if you say This was the problem felt by the people in past about their beliefs and therefore they attributed the false tales of mojzat with them and there is no reality in it than I want to ask how will you be sure about a person claiming to become a nabi is actually a nabi b/c he will say Allah says to me this this this than why will we believe him????

Comments by: aurangzaib On 05 March 2011Report Abuse
Dear friend Ali Haider,  
 
First of all, let us agree that Mo'jazaat just don't play a role in admitting that a person is Nabi, BECAUSE, the Mo'jazaat that were allegedly shown by a Nabi had not forced the disbelievers into believing in him. That is very evident from the history of Nabis' endeavors. Mohammad pbuh, according to Rivayaat, showed Mo'jazat to people of Makkah - still they did not believe in him. Eventually, he had to conquer Makkah with force in the last years of his life.  
 
Secondly, Can you kindly make your query more specific. You said :  
 
“This whole system of nabowat and risalat seems to be very illogical and it raises many questions in our mind particularly in those who want to understand THE RELIGION. “  
 
Why do you feel it is “illogical”? What “questions it raises” in your mind? If you can just jot down those questions, it might be very convenient to answer them.  
 
Then you said :  
 
“Than the question arises that if a person claims whether he was in past or even today that he is a nabi and he receives wahe(i dont want to go in the details of wahe here)or says ALLAH says this to me etc........why will we believe him?????”  
 
I think, we will sure not believe in him just like that ! He will have to show us proofs and we will scrutinize those proofs very strictly on their merit as well as on the criterion of our knowledge, intellect, science, circumstantial evidence, rationality and logic, etc.  
 
In the past too, Messengers were initially not thought credible generally. It was the merits of their divine message and the charisma of their personality which gradually attracted people towards them; and it was their exceptionally noble character that forced people to believe in them.  
 
If a Messenger is divinely appointed in the present times, I think, he will be a man of unmatched qualities and highest human attributes. He will be the one with unparalleled wisdom, genius and foresight. He will be the best combination of leader of men, diplomat, ruler and general. His role will always be that of the Saviour of humanity.  
He will stand up against the hegemonic designs of super powers and against all exploiters and tyrants of the time.  
 
So, I think, it may not be difficult to recognize him, IF he appears in our modern, scientific age.  
 
God bless you.  

Comments by: Dr. Qamar Zaman On 05 March 2011
Dear Ali Haider,  
You have answered your own question in your comments .Aurangzeb bhai has also explained beautifully.  
Yes you are right that nobody on earth can make others to believe that the creator talks to him .  
Its the teachings which differentiate him from other persons . you are again right that whole system of نبوت and رسالت is misunderstood either intentionally or unintentionally. Supernatural aspect with mythological background is attached to the concept of رسالت and نبوت , in simple words رسالت means to convey the message ,and نبوت means the appointment of a person at a position where he has authority to implement the message .  
The proof for that is that we don’t find any terminology in Quran for “ Head of a state “ except نبی .All the orders given to نبی are for the head of the state .  
So he has not to prove his position of نبوہ by miracles as نبوہ has no supernatural or mythological aspect . none of the head of the state in past present or in future has to prove his mythological appointment . It’s the people who decide the best person for that post ,and once selected or elected he has all the powers to implement laws .  
 

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 06 March 2011Report Abuse
Dear Participants ! What about KHUMAINI / AHMADI NAZAD(IRANIAN PRESIDENT) in the light of Aurangzaib's reply " If a Messenger is divinely appointed in the present times, I think, he will be a man of unmatched qualities and highest human attributes. He will be the one with unparalleled wisdom, genius and foresight. He will be the best combination of leader of men, diplomat, ruler and general. His role will always be that of the Saviour of humanity.  
He will stand up against the hegemonic designs of super powers and against all exploiters and tyrants of the time. light of Aurangzaib's reply "( by aurangzaib).......................................................Dear teacher Qamarzaman ! is it not sufficient to compare any climate of prophet (risalat) with the attributes written in VERSE 2/129??

Comments by: Junaid On 06 March 2011Report Abuse
Salaam;  
 
Dear brother Naeem Sheikh, I truly understand your noble intention and I must say that you have learned the true concepts of Islam in a short span of time. However, I am still unable to understand why you are always trying to compare the current leaderships of different parts of the world with Islamic economic and legislative system. I have seen your posts where you stated EU and UN as Islamic constitutions despite the fact that there is so much injustice and inequality, tyranny, suppression and aggression in todays world, where the wealth is circulating exclusively among the riches depriving more than 90% of the remaining population. How could this system be compared to Islam?  
As far as your new theory of Khumaini as true representative of Islamic system is concerned, please allow me to share a research by Akhtar Shirazi who portrayed the true picture of the legislative and economic system in Iran.  
(I have done some research on the economy and government structure of Iran on my own and I totally agree to the following analysis done by Akhtar Shirazi);  
 
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
"The modern Shi’ah priesthood, especially in Iran, the only Shi’ah majority country in the world, has no concept what kind of constitution, and the charter of rights and obligations, along with civil and penal codes the Qur’an presents, and how much people friendly this system is. The current governments established at all levels, such as central, provincial and municipal, are neither democratic nor Islamic. In fact, everywhere there exist an awful combination of dictatorship and elements of democracy.  
 
The Supreme Leader of Iran, of course a Grand Ayatollah, who remains in power until death, is responsible for the delineation and supervision of "the general policies of the Islamic Republic." He is the Commander-in-Chief of the armed forces, controls the military intelligence and security operations; and has the only power to declare war. The Supreme Leader appoints the heads of judiciary, state radio, television networks, the commanders of police and military forces, and six out of the twelve members of the Council of Guardians. Since the establishment of the Islamic Republic of Iran, there have only been two Supreme Leaders; Ruhollah Khomeini, 1979–1989, and Ali Khamenei, 1989 – continuing on.  
 
The Assembly of Experts elects and dismisses the Supreme Leader on basis of qualifications and popular esteem—no one has seen dismissal so far. The Assembly of Experts is responsible for supervising the Supreme Leader in the performance of legal duties. However, that is just hogwash, as the person under reference is too powerful for any individual or organization to take up head on. This is plain and simple dictatorship strengthened and augmented with the authority of religion.  
 
The elected president of Iran is, in fact, a miserable wretch, who simply runs errands and carries out commands of the Supremo, though he receives a mandate from the masses at the time of election. He is in servitude to a religious dictator, which the sociologists consider to be of the most horrific kind. A vast majority of illiterate people remains apprehensive about it, and never ever dare to oppose it. They did revolt against the Shah, but would never dare to turn against the Grandiose, because this time they would be committing a grave sin, punishable in hell. The ‘opium of religion’ would do the trick and keep them in check.  
 
There is a strong undercurrent gaining strength, especially, among the literate Iranians, that the country’s over all economic situation was much better during the reign of the Shah, which was toppled by the religious frenzy of the common people, instigated and accentuated manifold by the religious mafia of Ruhollah Khomeini and his cohorts.  
 
The alleged religious revolution of Iran has let the people down and has made their life miserable. It has been a total failure on the economic front, which the ostensible leaders of the revolution did stress upon the most, as the main premise. Now, 40/50% university graduates cannot find jobs, in the land, which used to be a thriving industrial and commercial market, where skilled people from the sub-continent used to come looking for all sorts of jobs.  
 
The Supremo and his allied Mullahs lack the vision of turning the oil rich country into an industrial giant. It is bad luck of the Iranians that their leaders lack knowledge, aptitude, and the requisite expertise for industrializing the country. The Mullah Hegemony is corrupt to the core, and cares a damn for their citizens. However, they have made them very happy by giving them unbridled sexual freedom, through the institution of Mut’ah. The unemployed young men and women, who cannot get married due to financial problems, take out their frustration through temporary marriage, due to which teen pregnancy has increased by whopping 70%, within the last five to ten years. Incidentally, now, in Iran, 60% of the total population standing at 145 million is under 25."  
------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------  
 
Considering the above quoted analysis of the so called Iranian democracy, you can easily understand whether Khumaini (man of unmatched qualities) and his successors are representing the true Islamic ideology or are they representing the concept of autocracy or monarchy.

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 06 March 2011Report Abuse
Dear Junaid! "What about KHUMAINI / AHMADI NAZAD(IRANIAN PRESIDENT" in the light of Aurangzaib's reply( by Naeem sheikh)................................................................................................................................................................................................... As far as your new theory of Khumaini as true representative of Islamic system is concerned. The Supremo and his allied Mullahs lack the vision of turning the oil rich country into an industrial giant. It is bad luck of the Iranians that their leaders lack knowledge, aptitude, and the requisite expertise for industrializing the country. The Mullah Hegemony is corrupt to the core, and cares a damn for their citizens. However, they have made them very happy by giving them unbridled sexual freedom, through the institution of Mut’ah. The unemployed young men and women, who cannot get married due to financial problems, take out their frustration through temporary marriage, due to which teen pregnancy has increased by whopping 70%, within the last five to ten years. Incidentally, now, in Iran, 60% of the total population standing at 145 million is under 25." Considering the above quoted analysis of the so called Iranian democracy, you can easily understand whether Khumaini (man of unmatched qualities) and his successors are representing the true Islamic ideology or are they representing the concept of autocracy or monarchy.(by Junaid)...................................................................................................................................................................................................My dear there is always difference of visions in two different sights, also there is difference of opinion in two data based analysis. My question was based at the assumptions written above. P lease read the conclusion of my question "Dear teacher Qamarzaman ! is it not sufficient to compare the person( who is presenting himself as a prophet) (rasool/ nabi/imam) with the attributes written in VERSE 2/129?? .Brother Junaid ! i'm 100% agree with your research work but read the verse 2/129 and compare it with the attributes suggested by brother Aurangzaib.

Comments by: moazzam On 07 March 2011
Brother Ali Haider, Dear Naeem Sheikh! To recognize the “RASOOL” in your society the following points have to be noted.Brother Naeem! you are right in your stance "nead not to run after the personalities rather attributes and qualities have to be observed,as mentioned in verse 2/129".  
 
1:- say NO to the mojzat, analyze rationally  
2:- Consult Alkitab.  
3:- Rasool in any society should be the native of the same community.  
4:-He must be the follower / and guide to follow AYAAT ULLAH  
5:- He must teach them the true sense of ALKITAB.  
6:- He must have / and teach the attributes of highest wisdom/ genius by his foresight knowledge.  
7”- He must purify his nation from all evils of the time with his unique foresighted plan and actions.  
 
I think Brother Aurangzaib is right in his reply that,  
”If a Messenger is divinely appointed in the present times, I think, he will be a man of unmatched qualities and highest human attributes. He will be the one with unparalleled wisdom, genius and foresight. He will be the best combination of leader of men, diplomat, ruler and general. His role will always be that of the Savior of humanity.  
He will stand up against the hegemonic designs of super powers and against all exploiters and tyrants of the time.  
 
So, I think, it may not be difficult to recognize him, IF he appears in our modern, scientific age” (by aurangzaib)  
 

Comments by: ali.haideer On 12 March 2011Report Abuse
A.o.a:  
Thanks to all for their comments.  
The Questions which a man who want to understand Islam as a religion will raise are: Why do we believe Muhammad S.A.W was a nabi?  
If you claim that he was a nabi on the basis of his achievements than I can also produce a number of records from history that will shift the balance in my favour, its another thing that a particular group of people is not accepting that history of Islam but it is a obvious fact that it is a source of information and we can't reject it. Even we believe that there was an era of Muhammad s.a.w just on the basis of this History. How can we come to know that some 1400 years ago there was a person so and so and he was given a book Quran there is no any other sourc except this history.  
Other thing which is totally illogical that is 1 man from the whole nation is being chosen by the God and he receives msg from him latter on he transfers it appoints messangers and he becomes RASOOL AND NABI respectively.  
Can a man using a little bit sense believe on all this FICTION???  
Why GOD appoints 1 man???? Why to believe he is receivning msgs from God??????(we find many ayats in quran where there is the involvment of third person)  
This all and even the existance of God himself is ambigious!!!!!!!!!!!!! Where is God??? Why we can't see him??? Why he has kept himself hidden from us??? why he is not talking to us directly?????  
To stop people from asking these questions even Prophets themselves used different techniques like a verse in soreh fateh which says eman bil ghaib(after sir syed, pervez and other the meaning to believe in unseen has been changed a little bit). other wise prophets at that time tried people to believe in unseen and said not to raise questions about the existance of GOD!!!!!!!  
This whole system, this whole discusion becomes illogical.......................  
Even aastana team claims that :- Rasool in any society should be the native of the same community.even than they are keen to follow Muhammad s.a.w and interpret a book which is in ARABIC.  
Hope there will be a healthy discussion onwards.  
Muhammad Ali Haideer  
Larkana, Sindh

Comments by: moazzam On 12 March 2011
Dear Ali haider !Your objection that" Even aastana team claims that :- Rasool in any society should be the native of the same community.even than they are keen to follow Muhammad s.a.w and interpret a book which is in ARABIC.  
Hope there will be a healthy discussion onwards".  
(Muhammad Ali Haideer )  
To know the facts in this regard plz read the following points.  
1:- The sense of Quranic terminology "KITABUN ARABIYUN" doesn't means The text in Arabic Alpha Bets rather the self explainatery book.see the verse 41/3.  
2:- The sense of Kitabun Arabiyun is the book which make the people understand/ explain its message very clear by TASREEF AL AYAAT see the vese 20/113.  
3:-The antonym of Arabiyun is Aajamiyun which means not articulate(chaos some), therefore this Quran is arranged in Arabiyun formate/ unique style to deliver its clear message, see the verse 41/44  
4:- After making the divine message cleared by describing the stories of many prophets and their nations, it is realized that this quran is in "Lisanun Arabiyun Mubeen". So It became apparent to scholars of Bani Israil due to its Arabic formate(unique style).If it would be in Aajamiyun farmate they might not be so cleared to them see the verse 26/195. .  
5:-By readiung the verses 39/27-28 the sense of "Quranun Arabiyun" will become very clear, ARABIYUN = GHAIRA ZE IWAJJ = STREIGHT (with out chaos and ambiguety) the book which is full of examples.  
6:- Go through the verses43/3,12/2 what would be the relation of "wisdom and Arabic language" if we consider it as in a usual sense of "Quran in Arabic language". How many Arab native falls in the catogary of TAAQILOON..  
CONCLUSION: If this Quran(as per its unique farmate) would be in any other language whether english or chines even then it would be called QUTANUN ARABIYUN MUBEEN due to its unique style of explaination.  
As far as second part of your question is concerns, it is very much cleared from the entire text of Quran that there is no any detail of prophet Mohammad's life to follow as a "USWA-E-HASANAH' rather the prophet IBRAHEEM and his life has been described in details. and we are ordered to follow "USWA-E-HASANAH OF PROPHET IBRAHEEM", see the verses 60/4-6 ,16/123,6/161,4/125,3/95,2/130--135,22/78..

 REPORT ABOUT ABUSING COMMENTSCancell
 YOUR REMARKS 
MemberID : Password: >> Forgot Id/Password
Comments by: Nargis2 On 13 March 2011Report Abuse
Because "Abu Huraira" wasnt alive at the time of Prophet Abraham...  

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 13 March 2011Report Abuse
Sister Nargis, Ali Haider ! Does the above mentioned new theory of "USWA-E-HASANA" (presented by Moazzam) make any sense to accept as it sounds some thing new??

Comments by: momin On 14 March 2011Report Abuse
Very strange. interesting , amazing , astonishing , please proceed further.

Comments by: Nargis2 On 14 March 2011Report Abuse
I asked the same quesiton to a shia fanatic who said we have to follow "millate ibrahim" who was a "shia"(and every prophet was shiane ibrahim :-S). I asked him, why do you have hadith's of ahl bayt instead of Prophet Abraham? (These sad loosers then invited me to meet up for a physical fight at the lovely sweet pyara sohna sohna "imam bargah" or their mutah masjid. My brother wouldnt let me go otherwise i would go and kick their beard off )  
 
Haqiqate Salaat page 40 : http://aastana.com/books/15_E.PDF  
 
“O Prophet, you must follow Abraham’s way (course of action, line, etc.)”.  
 
It means that our Prophet’s whole life was the pursuit of Prophet Abraham. Whatever he worked for was according to Prophet  
Abraham’s model. That’s why, whenever Prophet Abraham spoke about establishment of Salaat, he talked about a  
divine kingdom. Whenever our Prophet was ordered to follow Prophet Abraham’s way, he certainly was ordered to  
adopt the way of Abraham or the discipline of Abraham.  
 
“Qul li’ibaadi allazina aamanu, yuqimus Salaata wa yunfiqu mimma  
razaqnahum sirran wa ‘alaaniyatan min qabli an ya’ti youma la bayi’un  
fihi wa la khilalan”.  
 
“Tell those of my subjects who believe, to establish Salaat and, secretly or openly, spend in the way of Allah from the  
sustenance we have granted them, before that day comes when there will be no bargaining and no friendship”.  
 
It is apparent that in this verse too, our Prophet is ordered, as Prophet Abraham was ordered, to insist upon Mominoon  
to unite under a discipline according to divine commandments and keep open the doors of sustenance for  
everyone from what God has bestowed them with. Haqiqate salaat page 41  
 
Maybe prophet Ibrahim started the work with establishing the Salaat in a Ghayir zi zar’in”place. because the nation was ghair zarin/ dead . so their dead minds should be replaced by "life" (not 72 wife(s) because there is not wife without life) At the core of their ghair zaring heart mind, it now should be established knowledge (Salaat). . So this practice (the establishment of Salaat) is the only corresponds to the evil that causes "ghari zarin" minds ????  
 
Ill go and eat some salad yumminummi  

Comments by: ali.haideer On 19 March 2011Report Abuse
I have raised many questions and these need mind blowing answers from aastana team.  
1. As per Quran we know that there will be a nabi for every nation and that will be from themselves than its beyond comprehension that the whole aastana team is wasting there energy in exploring the meanings of Quran which was revealed to an Arab??? The logic says that there should be a book in our native language i.e. Urdu, Sindhi, Punjabi etc.....Why did God let us in lurch?????? Its totally unjustice to us!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!! WHY IT IS SO????  
2. In the last 1400 years I don't found a single person in SINDH claiming NABOWAT, therefore don't you assume that the whole sysytem is fictitious?????if there is any system of giving divine guidance, etc why it has not happened in the last 1400 years?????????  
3. in this modern era if some body says he is hearing voices from God it will take no time to label him a patient of SCHIZOPHRENIA.......................... same was the case of MIRZA GHULAM AHMED QADIYANI that some modren Muslims tried to justify that he is not Mehdi by labelling him the patient having Hallucinations................  
4.Upto now we don't find a single solid ground to satisfy our idea of Nabowat, Risalat, Wahe, Divine revelation........Can you satisfy any person on logical grounds about all this fiction????????  
Muhammad Ali Haideer, Larkana, Sindh

Comments by: moazzam On 19 March 2011
Brother Muhammad Ali Haideer, Larkana, Sindh  
1:- Only one nabi / rasool for all mankind till coming 1400 years or more with a book written in Arabic text seems justified for CHINA, Australia, Brazil etc etc???. At least there should be true translators and real interpreters with a wisdom of Ayatullah in respective languages (Quran calls them rasool)  
2:- You didn’t find any prophet in last 1400 years in Sindh, this might be your fault.( at least you should know the attributes of Nabi / Rasool)  
3:- Nabi / Rasool can’t hear the voices from Allah (at least you should know the revealing procedure of wahy.  
 
4:- Any idea based at our/your ground possess no weight, rather Quranic based solid grounds matters more.(at least you should check and believe the references quoted from Quran)  
 

Comments by: Damon On 19 March 2011 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
Salaam Dear Aastana,  
 
Dr. Asarul Islam has an essay at his website on Allama G.A. Parvez and how he is the "forgotten comrade" of Mohammed Ali Jinnah.  
 
I was thinking can we say that Allama Parvez can be considered the "Quranic Ideologue" of the Pakistan movement and Mohammed Ali Jinnah was the "Political Visionary"? And if so, can this bring us closer to understanding "nabiy" and "rasool", the relationship they have to each other and the distinctive roles they each play in establishing a welfare state based on the Quranic Constitution?  
 
In other words, you have Allama Parvez (the Quranic Ideologue) and Mohammed Ali Jinnah (the Political Visionary). Which one played the role of Nabiy and which played the role of rasool?  
 
I hope I am wording my question adequately enough to be understood.  
 
Salaam,  
Damon.

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
HAQIQAT E HADITH
Was Muhammad (pbuh) given revelation more than the Quran (surah:shura:51-52) (surah Al-Nisaa:163) ? Question by: Hafiz Abdullah From PAKISTAN (RAWALPINDI) On 06/03/2010
 
was zaid adopted son of muhammad(s)? did muhammad(s) really married zainab,his adopted son's wife?also cite the reference of FABRICATED HADITH that say zainab was changing clothes and muhammad(s) saw her and fell in love with her Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 12/07/2010
 
I have heard some Mullah that hadith was not written 250 year after the demise of prophet.but hadith were there even 100 years before bukhari.is it right?i think there is something wrong. Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 23/08/2010
 
Dear dr qamar sahib and brother aurangzaib what is the reality of SAHIFA e SADIQA of omer bin al'as by which the hadith lovers prove that hadith writing was started in the life time of the prophet muhammd? Question by: bilal_khan5181 From PAKISTAN On 29/09/2010
 
99 names of Allah ? we need 3 moore, coz look at the Zorostrians :-O Question by: bob From UNITED KINGDOM On 02/10/2010
 
How valid are Hadith and do they contradict the Quran? Question by: William From UNITED KINGDOM On 07/12/2010
 
It just Resemble "Muqaam-e-Hadees" of Mr.Perwaiz. Any how partially good effort. My observations:- Mr.Ameen Hassan was follower of Mr.Maududi, Goth Machi resolution separated them both have same thoughts. MuqaameHadees" should have not been refered. Question by: M.N.Khalid From PAKISTAN (ISLAMABAD) On 08/12/2010
 
I want to know what efforts are being taken by the real scholars of Al-Quran ,to enforce the teachings of Allah's kalam in the 'Madarsa'? How can we make the students of madarsa, to know the reality of 'Muqame Hadith' in Islamic literature? Question by: shakir azim On 11/12/2010
 
Dear Dr. Sb. As salam. Sir I know the concept of Atiullah wa atiur-raool but. dr. sb quran ki rooh se koi aisi majboot daleel dijiye jisse bat nikhar ke samne aa jaye aur ham Tableeg kar sake. Question by: trouncenawaz@yahoo.co.in On 10/02/2011
 
Dr.sb.,Meri bat ahle-e-hadis walo se chal rahi hai. wo kahte hai ki " Tumhari Biwi aur tumme hamne(Allah)ne rahmat dal di: 64/14 " Tumahrai baaz biwi tumhari dushman hai" 30/21 . ye tazad mitaye pls. Fahem se nahi quran ki aayat se. Question by: trouncenawaz@yahoo.co.in On 10/02/2011
 
English Translation of 'Haqiqat e Hadith' is now available for downloading. Download Question by: Adnan From PAKISTAN On 10/06/2011
 
Assalam, I would like to know if Bukhori's and the rest are not reliable, then which sayings of Muhammad (SAW) can we rely? Muhammad (SAW) sure gave his speech everyday here and there and a lot of people heard and recorded it somehow. Question by: Yaid From MALAYSIA (KUALA LUMPUR) On 20/07/2013
 
soore mursalat me shuruki ayat me peghame tarseel ka zikr hai. so agar mursalt ka matlab pegham rasani hoga to telecommucation bhi to uski ek shakal he jo electromagnetic waves ke anjam pa raha he .to kya aj allah ka wada savh nahi hua ? Question by: mohd yahya From INDIA (BHOPAL) On 01/11/2013
 
salam every one can some one tell me who these Mullahs are?( aastana the conspiracy) they call us atheists. DO they know the meaning of atheist ? Question by: kanju swat From UNITED KINGDOM (LONDON) On 23/02/2016
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com