Blog Home Member's Area  AastanaBlog: AASTANA.COM 

Join AASTANABLOG
Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's.
It's free, easy and only takes a minute.
Sign up Now

TRANSLATION OF QURAN
BY DR. QAMAR ZAMAN
Translation Status
آیات
سورۃ
نمبر
1-7 الفَاتِحَة -1
1-286 البَقَرَة -2
1-200 آل عِمرَان -3
1-176 النِّسَاء -4
1-120 المَائدة -5
1-165 الاٴنعَام -6
1-206 الاٴعرَاف -7
1-75 الاٴنفَال -8
1-129 التّوبَة -9
1-109 یُونس -10
1-123 هُود -11
1-111 یُوسُف -12
1-43 الرّعد -13
1-52 إبراهیم -14
1-99 الحِجر -15
1-128 النّحل -16
1-111 بنیٓ اسرآئیل / الإسرَاء -17
1-110 الکهف -18
1-98 مَریَم -19
1-135 طٰه -20
1-112 الاٴنبیَاء -21
1-78 الحَجّ -22
1-118 المؤمنون -23
1-64 النُّور -24
1-77 الفُرقان -25
1-227 الشُّعَرَاء -26
1-93 النَّمل -27
1-88 القَصَص -28
1-69 العَنکبوت -29
1-60 الرُّوم -30
1-34 لقمَان -31
1-30 السَّجدَة -32
1-73 الاٴحزَاب -33
1-54 سَبَإ -34
1-45 فَاطِر -35
1-83 یسٓ -36
1-182 الصَّافات -37
1-88 صٓ -38
1-75 الزُّمَر -39
1-85 المؤمن / غَافر -40
1-54 حٰمٓ السجدة / فُصّلَت -41
1-54 القَمَر -54
Read Now


»«
AASTANA.COM
AASTANABLOG
Add Your QuestionView More QuestionsEmail this DiscussionPrinter Friendly View
assalamu alaikum all brothers!  
you guys are sharing the great information, nice job.  
Add Your Comments  Question by: ZAHIR On 25 February 2010
Comments by: zahir On 27 February 2010Report Abuse
salam!  
how could i be the executive member of aastana blog?

Comments by: alam1162@gmail.com On 30 August 2011Report Abuse
MUBARAK, MUBARAK, JASHN-E-NAZOOL-E-QURA’N MUBARAK TO ALL

Comments by: Perwez1 On 30 August 2011Report Abuse
alam1162@gmail.com: MUBARAK, MUBARAK, JASHN-E-NAZOOL-E-QURA’N MUBARAK TO ALL  
 
Perwez: Sir, I saw exactly the same message at Quaideazam.com today. I want to ask you a question if you don't mind.  
Are you Awais Durrani of Jannat Pakistan Party ??? If yes then I must say it's a pleasure meeting you :)  
 
Also please tell me why you used the words JASHN-E-NUZOOL-E-QURAN for EID???  
Is there anything written in Quran about Eid???  
YES or NO  
And if nothing is mentioned in Quran, where else did you get all this information from???

Comments by: Nargis On 30 August 2011Report Abuse

Brother Moazzam please explain Eid here 5:114  
 
قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّنَا أَنزِلْ عَلَيْنَا مَآئِدَةً مِّنَ السَّمَاء تَكُونُ لَنَا عِيداً لِّأَوَّلِنَا وَآخِرِنَا وَآيَةً مِّنكَ وَارْزُقْنَا وَأَنتَ خَيْرُ الرَّازِقِينَ


Comments by: moazzam On 31 August 2011
Sister Nargis ! Read the following terminologies, to comprehend the sense of tha verse 5/114.  
مَآئِدَةً = the root "MAIDATAN" means the amount and measure of things/distance,Mode,manners, fashion  
The extracted sense is permanent values/standerds  
عِيداً = Root is AWD, The state which repeatedly comes ,(references for consultation), because festivels repeats each year therefore called "Eid"to be more cleared see the verses 30/27,29/19,30/11,20/55.  
نَّأْكُلَ = So that we could understand  
وَتَطْمَئِنَّ قُلُوبُنَا = we could make our self satisfied.  
Read the verses 5/111-115  
5/111 ; And [remember] when I inspired to the disciples, be peace provider with My commandments and My messenger as well They said, "We became Momin, so bear witness that indeed we are Muslims [in submission to Allah]."  
5/112 [And remember] when the disciples said, "O Eisa ib e maryam, can your Lord يُنَزِّلَ to usمَآئِدَةً from the heaven? [Eisa] said," اتَّقُواْ اللّهَ , if you want to be the Momineen.  
5/113: They said, "We wish to comprehend it and let our hearts be reassured and know that you have been truthful to us and be among its witnesses."  
5?114: Said Eisa, the ibn e maryam "O Allah , our Lord, أَنزِلْ عَلَيْنَا مَآئِدَةً مِّنَ السَّمَاءِ ( Nuzool of values and standerds to judge) , to be for us عِيداً (refference) for the first of us and the last of us and a sign from You. And provide for us, and You are the best of providers."  
5?115: Allah said, "Indeed, I will sent it down to you[, إِنِّي مُنَزِّلُهَا عَلَيْكُمْ ]but whoever conceeled the fects [ يَكْفُرْ ] afterwards from among you - then indeed will I punish him with a punishment by which I have not punished anyone among the worlds."  
قَالَ عِيسَى ابْنُ مَرْيَمَ اللَّهُمَّ رَبَّنَا أَنزِلْ عَلَيْنَا مَآئِدَةً مِّنَ السَّمَاءِ تَكُونُ لَنَا عِيداً لِّأَوَّلِنَا وَآخِرِنَا وَآيَةً مِّنكَ وَارْزُقْنَا وَأَنتَ خَيْرُ الرَّازِقِينَ  
5/115  
قَالَ اللّهُ إِنِّي مُنَزِّلُهَا عَلَيْكُمْ فَمَن يَكْفُرْ بَعْدُ مِنكُمْ فَإِنِّي أُعَذِّبُهُ عَذَابًا لاَّ أُعَذِّبُهُ أَحَدًا مِّنَ الْعَالَمِينَ  
Eisa demonded/requested to concieve in his mind (Nuzool) the universal values/standerds from Allah, which could be used as a source of refference.

Comments by: Nargis On 31 August 2011Report Abuse

So EID became the last DAY of a month of starving (23.59 sharp?) for Quran flying down from heaven, instead of it being a measurement / conduct whenever needed as a reference for consultation?The ritual adapted mind will look for routines, as long as something in the Quran can be twisted to signify minutes, hours and days..I had a great Eid though, learned something new from my brilliant brother moazzam again:-D Thank you so much


Comments by: drshabbir On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
NEO-CRIMINAL OF ISLAM  
 
Respected Sisters & Brothers!  
 
BEWARE!  
 
Dr. QZ is RE-WRITING the Quran. Stop inflating his Satanic ego, for, you will be held accountable in the Court of Allah.  
 
His Arabic is poor and English pathetic. Do not follow this neo-Criminal of Islam to Hell!  
 
After reading the beautifully written critique of Brother Aurangzeb Yusufzai, I have a feeling that Dr. Qamar Zaman might claim to be a messenger of God.  
 
Our Beacon Forum  
QZ Re-writing the Quran  
By:Hamid Khan, RWP  
Date: Tuesday, 20 September 2011, 8:02 am  
 
Dear friends, Assalam alaykum  
 
One of Dr? Qamaruzzaman's (aastana.com) strong supporters, Aurangzeb Yusufzai who translated some of his books in English, quits in disgust, "He is re-writing the Quran."  
 
Please click to read his reasons.  
 
Regards,  
 
Hamid Khan  
 
https://docs.google.com/viewer?a=v&pid=explorer&chrome=true&srcid=0BzqYOI9Sm5xcMzc3MDM2OTItOTU1NC00MGQwLWE1MTMtNGIzMGU4YzUwMmZm&hl=en_US  
 
Our Beacon Forum  
QZ rewriting the Qur'an  
By:*Dr. Shabbir, Florida  
Date: Thursday, 22 September 2011, 9:25 am  
In Response To: Re: Help! I need somebody! Any helpers? (jawaid ahmed,uk)  
 
Azizam,  
 
If you could read Urdu, you would appreciate Aurangzeb's article.  
 
I cannot type the details but a few examples should be enough.  
 
Dr Qamar Zaman writes:  
 
"Muhammad was not an individual. Anyone who is praiseworthy is Muhammad. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets. Anyone who cleanses the environment like a razor removes hair, is Musa. Any man who becomes a great grandfather is Ibrahim ....... and so on."  
 
"....Similarly, there is no such thing as the people of Nooh, people of Firon, people of Shoaib etc. The Qur'an narrates only their make-believe stories for our understanding...."  
 
"Zina does not mean adultery. It means a corrupt nation."  
 
"Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise."  
 
"There is no such thing as life after death. By Akhira, the Qur'an means the future of a nation in this world."  
 
"Nabi and Rasul were not specific people. Any genius man is a Nabi. If that genius conveys his wisdom to people he is a Rasul."  
 
I read Aurangzeb's long article and checked a few things at aastana website, all in a bit of hurry. So, there could be some trifle inaccuracies in what I wrote above.  
 
He is certainly rewriting the Qur'an.  
 
I suspect that QZ might soon claim to be a messenger of God like Rashad Khalifa did. He has some blind followers inflating his ego. Many of his "disciples" are now rebelling.  
 
LET US SEE IF THIS COMMENT REMAINS ON THIS "DEMOCRATIC" FORUM OR NOT :-)  
 
NOTE: QZ's blind followers will get no response from me for their diatribe.  
 
 

Comments by: Perwez1 On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Thank you for your input Dear Dr. Shabbir. We respect your opinion and your rights regarding freedom of speech.  
I am sure rest of the aastana members will also treat you with respect and politeness, because this is what Quran has taught us.  
However, I request you to kindly go through all the material available at aastana website including Quranic translations and guide us by providing your scholarly input, correcting the mistakes you see in terms of grammar and translation of Arabic words.  
Any corrections from your side will be highly appreciated.

Comments by: Waqar On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
2:102  
اور ان باتوں کی اتباع کرنے لگے جو سلیمان کے عہدِ سلطنت کے خلاف سرکش افراد بتایا کرتے تھے اور سلیمان نےاحکامات الہی کا انکار نہیں کیا، بلکہ سرکش افراد ہی انکار کرتے تھے کہ لوگوں کوجھوٹ سکھاتے تھے۔ اور ان باتوں کی بھی پیروی کرنے لگ گئے جو بابل ( طاقت و جھوٹ) کے ذریعے دو سرکردہ لوگ ہاروت (سرکش افراد) اور ماروت (سرکش افراد کے مددگار) پر اتری تھیں اور وہ دونوں کسی کو کچھ نہیں سکھاتے تھے، جب تک یہ نہ باور کرادیتے کہ ہم تو نجات دہندہ ہیں۔ تم ہماری باتوں کا انکار نہ کرو ۔پس لوگ ان سے وہ باتیں سیکھتےتھے ، جس سے سربراہ اور اس کی جماعت کے لوگوں کے درمیاں تفریق کر دیں اوروہ ان باتوں کے ذریعہ کسی کو ضررنہیں پہنچا تے تھے سوائے اگر اللہ کے احکامات میں گنجائش ہو۔ اور ان کو جو سکھاتے تھے اس سے وہ ان کو نقصان پہنچاتے تھے اور کچھ فائدہ نہ دیتے تھے اور انہیں خوب معلوم تھا کہ جو وہ تجارت کر رہے ہیں اس سے انہیں آخرت میں کچھ ملنے والا نہیں تھا اور جس چیزکے بدلے اپنے نفوس کی تجارت کی وہ بہت بری تھی۔کاش وہ اس بات کو جانتے۔  
جیسا کہ عرض کیا ملائکہ کوئی غیر مرئی مخلوق نہیں ہوتی ہے بلکہ ہم جیسےانسان ہی ہوتے ہیں۔ جب فرشتوں کا تصور مستعار لیا گیا تو اس کے ساتھ یہ تصور بھی آ گیا کہ فرشتے معصوم ہوتے ہیں۔اس وجہ سے یہ پریشانی لاحق ہوئی کہ وہ کیونکر غلط تعلیم دے سکتے ہیں۔ اگر آیات ۱۰۱ اور ۱۰۲ کو سامنے رکھیں اور آپس کا ربط بھی قائم رکھیں تو بات بڑی آسانی سے سمجھ آ جاتی ہے۔  
آیت ۱۰۱میں بتایا گیا کہ بنی اسرائیل کے پاس جب بھی کوئی رسول آیا تو انہوں نے اسکی تعلیمات کو ماننے سے نہ صرف انکار کر دیا بلکہ اس کے برخلاف خود ساختہ احکامات پر عمل کرتے تھے۔  
آیت ۱۰۲ میں سیدنا سلیمان کے قصے کو بطور دلیل بتایا گیا کہ ایسے ہی لوگوں نےسلیمان کی مملکت کے خلاف سازشیں کیں اور لوگوں سے کہتے تھے کہ ہم تو ذریعہ نجات ہیں تو ہماری بات کا انکار نہ کرو۔حالانکہ سلیمان نے اللہ کی آیات کا کفر نہیں کیا تھا بلکہ ایسے ہی لوگ اللہ کی آیات کا کفر کرتے تھے اور ایسی تعلیمات دیتے تھے جس کے ذریعے حکومت اور عوام کے درمیان تفریق پیدا ہو جائے ۔ان آیات میں چند الفاظ غور طلب ہیں  
۱ ۔ " علی ملک سلیمان " اس کا ترجمع "ملک سلیمان میں" کیا جاتا ہے ۔حالانکہ "علی"کے معنی "میں" نہیں ہوتے۔ "ملک سلیمان میں" کا ترجمع " فی ملک سلیمان " ہو گا ۔  
۲۔ دوسرا لفظ ہے فتنہ ، مادہ "ف ت ن"، معنی "آزمائش ، سونے کو آگ میں پگھلانا تاکہ کھوٹا کھرا معلوم ہو جائے ،نمود ذات کے مواقع تاکہ انسان کے اندر کی اچھائی اور برائی سامنے آ جائے اور تکلیفون سے بچانا ۔"  
علامہ عبد الرشید نعمانی نے لغات القرآن جلد ۵ صفحہ ۳۸ پر لفظ فتنہ اورفتوناّ کی بحث کرتے ہوئے سورہ طٰہ کی آیت ۵۰ کے تحت ایک حوالہ دیا ہے ۔فرماتے ہیں "بقول ابن عبّاس طرح طرح کی تکلیفوں سے بچایا ۔"

Comments by: moazzam On 26 September 2011
Dr. Shabbir a traditional intellect (not scholar) point to point answers to his allegations.  
Shabbir: Dr. QZ is RE-WRITING the Quran. Stop inflating his Satanic ego, for, you will be held accountable in the Court of Allah.  
Moazzam: The personality followers use to play blame game in the same style as you are doing. Same words has been used for GA Pervez and other Quranist in past by opponents, remember you might be Pervezi but you are seldem follwer of his teachings.  
Shabbir:His Arabic is poor and English pathetic. Do not follow this neo-Criminal of Islam to Hell!  
Moazzam:This is not a criteria to judge. The Arab native and linguistics are still following mythological based traslation and still stuch in rituals/dogmas,abusing GA Pervez(and other quranists and their interpretation).  
Shabbir: After reading the beautifully written critique of Brother Aurangzeb Yusufzai, I have a feeling that Dr. Qamar Zaman might claim to be a messenger of God.  
Moazzam: Any person who is carrying true quranic message and delivering to mankind in its true spirit (sense) if qualifies the attribute mentioned in Quran has been called Rasool by Allah.As for as Dr Qamar’s personality is concerns, he didn’t claim.  
 
Shabbir: If you could read Urdu, you would appreciate Aurangzeb's article.  
Moazzam: Mr Aurangzaib's allegations at aastana and point to point answers.  
1) Aastana.com devastating Islam by their materialistic approach of interpretation of Quran by quran.  
** Aastana's claim is, the religious leaders(orthodox interpreter ,mufassirs) devastated Islam by their mythological approach of interpretation of Quran by riwayat(ahadith).  
2) Aastana doesn't believe in Allah's personality.  
** Aastana believe in Allah as Allah introduced him self in Quran ( la tudriku hulabsaar wahuwa yudrikuho).  
3) Aastana denies life after death.  
** Aastana believes life after death, but we can not comprehend its formation therefore not detailed in Quran, remember each individual will be accountable of his deeds their (in life after death).  
4)Aastana advocates free sex in society.  
5) aastana never ever supports free sex ,rather in in favour of better legislation in this regard, in the light of quranic eternal values ( provided as a social code of conduct).  
6) Aastana deny each and every thing with could not be comprehended in this world.  
** Aastana's believe is that, every thing which Allah described in Quran is comprehensible(understandable), we are sure that, Allah not described any thing which is beyond human comprehension.(la yukalli fullaho nafsan illa wusaha)  
7) All above said devastated happened by maneuvering the quranic translation to satisfy and justify the agenda given by WEST(yahood o nasara).  
**Aastana never care about Wes, East or Middle east (Aastan always sounds with quranic references and empirical universal evidences) no matter to whom it against for/in favour.  
Shabbir: I cannot type the details but a few examples should be enough Dr Qamar Zaman writes: .  
Muhammad was not an individual. Anyone who is praiseworthy is Muhammad. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets. Anyone who cleanses the environment like a razor removes hair, is Musa. Any man who becomes a great grandfather is Ibrahim ....... and so on."  
Moazzam: Totally wrong and misquotation with out context, same as Mullahs usually do (the leg pulling old techniques,  
read the complete thread to comprehend the matter indeed.  
Shabbir: Similarly, there is no such thing as the people of Nooh, people of Firon, people of Shoaib etc. The Qur'an narrates only their make-believe stories for our understanding...."  
Moazzam: This topic is debatable, if you are interested to know the facts (not belief only) ,come at belog and participate in rational way with Quranic references. What a harm in it , if we say ,there are eternal guidance beyond time and space for each era.  
Shabbir: "Zina does not mean adultery. It means a corrupt nation."  
Moazzam: It seems you didn’t even bother to read the article, Yes the quranic term “ZINA” possess a great sense(meanings), that is to distort the quranic ideology which supports shirk. It is advised to go through the said article in detail and comment/rectify the errors if you have the caliber.  
 
Shabbir: "Wahi is not extrinsic revelation. A genius man absorbs knowledge from his environment and becomes wise."  
Moazzam: Don’t comment with out understanding the sense of Wahy in the light of Quran. Also advised to read the complete thread at relevant topic if you have the analytic approach(normally traditional intellect lakes in caliber).It will be appreciated if you guide us with quranic references.  
Shabbir: "There is no such thing as life after death. By Akhira, the Qur'an means the future of a nation in this world."  
Moazzam: the answer has been given in above paragraph.  
 
Shabbir: "Nabi and Rasul were not specific people. Any genius man is a Nabi. If that genius conveys his wisdom to people he is a Rasul."  
Moazzam” They are specific people, the rest part has also been replied above.  
 
Shabbir: I read Aurangzeb's long article and checked a few things at aastana website, all in a bit of hurry. So, there could be some trifle inaccuracies in what I wrote above.  
Moazzam: Don’t read in hurry , rather be calm and read carefully then comment, this is the matter of Deen/Quran/true guidance is needed to Muslim Ummah(and mankind in general).  
Shabbir: He is certainly rewriting the Qur'an.  
Moazzam: Is it not the same blame as Religious leaders imposed against GA Pervez. Open your eye (with wide vision) see new dimentions of this era.  
Shabbir: I suspect that QZ might soon claim to be a messenger of God like Rashad Khalifa did. He has some blind followers inflating his ego. Many of his "disciples" are now rebelling.  
Moazzam: These are the chronic Mullah’s thoughts  
Shabbir: LET US SEE IF THIS COMMENT REMAINS ON THIS "DEMOCRATIC" FORUM OR NOT :-)  
Moazzam: Aastana also given the space to Mr Aurangzaib’s booklet under discussion. This is your blog(our beacon) who impose sanctions, Not Aastana.  
Shabbir: NOTE: QZ's blind followers will get no response from me for their diatribe.  
Moazzam: I always ready to discuss this matter any time at this blog. Welcome Dr,Shabbir  

Comments by: Nargis On 26 September 2011Report Abuse

NEO MULLAH, Daku Shabbir ( Daku`= the plagiarist )  
 
I know you are very ill and your mental illness has provided you phantasms about Aliens, and I feel sorry for you. May Allah have mercy on your soul and brain…  
 
Alien fantasy: http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl/page/1/md/read/id/314123119166455  
 
However, is this line also affected by your illness, or is it your true cowardly personality

“QZ's blind followers will get no response from me for their diatribe. “

Why would you not respond the factual answers to your claims?  
 
No need for me to ask you, because I have seen your previous replies and you did the same; you write a monologue and are too scared of having a dialogue. If you are a true servant of Allah, and talking on behalf of Islam, then you must stand up (not the stand-up comedy you are doing here) to prove every allegation you come up with.  
 
You must explain every word through the context of the Quran, grammar and linguistics.  
 
If you take this challenge, then we can take the discussion point by point for all your accusations against the explanation of Dr Qamar Zaman. Like brother Moazzam said, you’re not a scholar of Islam but a traditionalist. However, you claim to be a doctor, so you must have gone through basic rules at the University for the Requirements of proving your assertions and how to back up your claims through sources.  
 
I see myself as one who has passed the fatwa- level of “sectism” and the neo mullah’s ignorant childish phrases through their blame game. Unfortunately you are still there as we can see…  
 
However, now it’s time to grow up and enter the new arena, and everyone talking on behalf of Islam should embraced a higher level of conversations and debates. Would your mental illness and hallucinations allow you to do that?  
 
You should understand the level we want to keep in our discussions. Evidences for your claims regarding the Quran, through its own language, grammar and linguistics should not be that difficult for a plagiarist like you; after all, you have gone through every book written by Quranists in order to steal their work. But here you must prove the Quran through the Quran and not through other scholars work, the one you have stolen.  
 
You must also provide evidences for your allegations against Dr Qamar Zaman and be man enough (Even though you hallucinate about Aliens) to come in the pitch armed with knowledge and proofs. This is a research forum, and not a news forum like your own, so I can understand you will have difficulties in being professional. Still, the requirements for evidences are a must.  
 
Even without the knowledge of Islam, people do have a rule of providing proofs for their allegations. Even a mass murderer have these rights, the court must provide evidences against him in order to decide the truth. And that they are doing without knowing about the Quran.  
 
Everything I say from now on regarding the Quran and your allegations, I will have full coverage for and explain through the Quran, let’s see if you are able to do the same?  
 
PS: you have said:

I have a feeling that Dr. Qamar Zaman might claim to be a messenger of God.  

Dear readers, please notice this point correlated with his fantasies of having contacts with or seeing aliens.  
 
It is in fact Daku Shabbir who is subliminally sending out a message of being in contact with higher forces and the unseen, as he is the only one who saw them; his other friends have passed away or something. Otherwise they would definitely support his heinous claims.

So the “messenger wanna be” and “prophet wanna be” is actually Daku Shabbir himself. Read between the lines....

You are also saying:.

QZ's blind followers

Blind followers eh?  
 
You claim to have contacts with Aliens, and here is a reply from your servant:

“Dear Dr. Shabbir, I know there are a lot of healthy skeptics on this thread, but it hasn't stopped it from growing a mile long in a few days! :)

I for one am still hoping you'll still share your other story, whether anyone believes you or not.”

Wa Salaam  
 
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl/page/1/md/read/id/314123119166518

Blind followers? Do you even know what it means? Have you ever done something original, can you show us even one idea you haven't stolen from Allama Parwez ?  
 
No need in deleting your Alien thread, I have taken pictures of your thread and saved it. Waiting for your response armed with evidences and linguistic knowledge of the Quran.


Comments by: DHULQARNAIN On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
SHABBIR: I have a feeling that Dr. Qamar Zaman might claim to be a messenger of God.  
 
***Dear readers, please notice this point correlated with his fantasies of having contacts with or seeing aliens.***  
 
Qamar would not be wrong to claim he's "a" messenger of Allah providing that he is accurately Quran Only and Alone for his guidance:  
 
44:5 A command from Us — truly We are ever sending messengers —  
 
I'm not certain though that he is accurately Quran Only and Alone for his guidance. Can you post exactly what the absolute core beliefs are of Qamar/Aastana Blog? That would be helpful so all can make an informed decision as to whether or not Shabbir's charges are accurate.  
 
Dhulqarnain-  
 

Comments by: bob On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
SHABBIR: Dr. QZ is RE-WRITING the Quran. Stop inflating his satanic ego, for, you will be held accountable in the Court of Allah.

***  
 
Did not Allama Parwez rework previous assertions about the Quran and then rephrased the Quran in contradiction to the previous translations?  
 
Did he not claim Malaika to be forces of nature in contradictions to the accepted belief of Angels?  
 
Did he not reject the accepted truth about miracles, namaz, Hajj and Zakat?  
 
Have you not taken his translation and replaced his words with your own words?  
 
You are using the word “Satanic Ego” and claim to see Aliens yourself. Funny that you said that, because it is in fact the pagans, called “Satanists” in modern days, who actually believe in Aliens
 
 
http://www.netscientia.com/egypt.html  
 
The blocks are so heavy and the pyramid so tall only aliens could achieve this. In the period 2500 BC man did not have the tools or knowledge necessary to build the pyramids, so only aliens could have done it.  
 
http://www.thekeyboard.org.uk/Who%20built%20the%20pyramids.htm  
 
http://www.mt.net/~watcher/conspir.html  
 
Aliens, UFOs, Demons, Illuminati & Satanism  
 
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Kn7oOVDse5s&feature=player_embedded  
 
The belief of angels, Demons, Aliens are in fact implemented by the Satanists of today, also called Freemasons/ Illuminati.  
 
SHABBIR: His Arabic is poor and English pathetic. Do not follow this neo-Criminal of Islam to Hell! ***  
 
Please provide us the material with reference to your research concerning Dr Qamar Zamans Arabic skills and shed light on what bases you are saying his Arabic is poor? Would you give us even one example from his books where he has displayed poor Arabic skills?You on the other hand, stated in QXP  
 
***Maula = The True Master = Lord Supreme. The extremely common practice of calling a religious leader as Maulana (Our Master) is a frank, deplorable form of Shirk (associating others with God). But the clergy take pride in it! Many verses in the Qur’an tell us that there is no Maulana but God(2:286, 9:51, 10:30, 34:31). It is amazing to note that the Muslim clergy write Maulana with their names, and with their own hand “

***  
http://ourbeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/admin2/2010/11/qxp_arabic1.8.pdf  
 
You have not distinguished between the common noun Maula (مولی as a common noun used in verse 44: 41 and 47:11) and Al Maulana as a proper noun (22:78)  
 
You have also taken the liberty to alter a word in the Quran, by adding information from yourself in relation to the word Bakkah
 
 
SHABBIR QXP: 3:96 He erected the First House (Sanctuary) appointed for all mankind, at the blessed Bakkah. It is to serve as a beacon of light for all humanity (in order to regain their lost unity). [2:125. Bakkah came to be known as Makkah later. In the ancient Arabic dialect b was interchangeable with m

***  
 
http://ourbeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/admin2/2010/11/qxp_arabic1.8.pdf  
 
At this place you have added information from yourself and changed the meaning of a word Bakkah, and called it Makkah instead. Are you authorized by Allah to play a word game with his words? How many words in the Quran are you going to change because their “ancient use” was different? Dear Sir, who have given you the authority to change the words in the Quran?  
 
You have translated وَالزَّانِي الزَّانِيَةُ to
“The habitual adulteress and the habitual adulterer”

***  
 
http://ourbeacon.com/wp-content/uploads/admin2/2010/11/qxp_arabic1.8.pdf  
 
As we can perceive, you have added habitual to make a sense of “AL”. Why have you added a word without confirming it from the Quran, how many other places is Al translated to “habitual”?  
 
If this is the run, the QXP `= Quran explain itself should be changed to SXP-QDXP, Shabbir Explain the Quran- Quran doesn’t explain itself!  
 
You claim to master the Arabic language, yet it is Dr Qamar Zaman who has written a book on soum with reference to the Arabic words. Let’s go through your other points
 
 
SHABBIR After reading the beautifully written critique of Brother Aurangzeb Yusufzai, I have a feeling that Dr. Qamar Zaman might claim to be a messenger of God.

***  
 
Before I reply to this part, would you kindly elaborate what you put in the word “beautiful” and “critique”?  
SHABBIR : One of Dr? Qamaruzzaman's (aastana.com) strong supporters, Aurangzeb Yusufzai who translated some of his books in English, quits in disgust, "He is re-writing the Quran."

***  
 
After reading previous posts by Mr Aurungzeb, it is not hard to grasp why he left. After reading his book it is not hard to comprehend his motives and intentions for being here in the first place. Aurungzeb’s book will be dealt with separately.  
 
SHABBIR : "Muhammad was not an individual. Anyone who is praiseworthy is Muhammad. Same is the case with other fictitious names of prophets. Anyone who cleanses the environment like a razor removes hair, is Musa. Any man who becomes a great grandfather is Ibrahim ....... and so on."

***  
 
Mohammed is used four / 4 times in the Quran, and never as a proper noun. Bk Anwar: In Arabic script common name takes "tenween" which means double Duma, Fatha or Kesra (for Urdu speaking Pesh, Zubar and Zear) at the last letter of noun. Whereas, when same common name or noun is used as proper name, it cannot take tenween.  
 
You have completely overlooked this point, whereas Dr Qamar Zaman has explained:  
 
" د is not " اسمالفاعل " It is " اسم المفعول " the word is from " باب تفعیل " and the paradigm is " مفعَّل " ( mufa'al ) not mufa'il ) e.g. معلَّم with zabar over " ل " it is not " محمِّد" with a zer under " م " but it is " محمد " with a zabar over " م " The second point  
 
" If Faail died then how would mohammad validate the fore comings prophets."  
 
This statement has an ambiguous word «prophet" which does not differentiate between NABI and RASOOL. "  
Other Indefinite nouns as an example: حَرَجٍ (22:78:14), شَهِيدًا (22:78:27)
 
 
SHABBIR : I suspect that QZ might soon claim to be a messenger of God like Rashad Khalifa did. He has some blind followers inflating his ego. Many of his "disciples" are now rebelling.

***  
 
Rashad Khalifa terminated two verses from the Quran in order to make his point; you changed the word Bakkah and composed your own version, transformed into Makkah. You have never differentiated between Rusool and AL Rusool, Nabi or AL Nabi, you made Maula equivalent with the proper noun AL Maula. And you claim to see Aliens… What directions are your acts pointing to; can you see similarities between you and Rashad Khalifa's actions?  
 
You have taken the liberty to point Fatweh on whomever you want; you have previously claimed that Dr Qamar Zaman is "Neo Criminal" along with Aidid Safar and Saim Bakar,  
 
http://www.ourbeacon.com/cgi-bin/bbs60x/webbbs_config.pl/md/read/id/314123119146683  
 
You have claimed that Allama Parwez was a denier of Dua:-
 
 
SHABBIR: - Posted: Sat Feb 09, 2008 5:04 am Post subject: To AY - DU'A  
The great scholar, Allama Perwez was a vehement denier of du'a.  
But we must look at the Quran. Wassalam,  
 
http://www.ourbeacon.com/phpBB2/viewtopic.php?t=1021  
 
Please explain your behavior, who gave you permission to point fingers at other scholars and deny them the privilege to study the Quran? Are you not trying to be chosen one from Allah to do this, I.E his prophet?  
 
 
SHABBIR: LET US SEE IF THIS COMMENT REMAINS ON THIS "DEMOCRATIC" FORUM OR NOT :-)  
 
Kindly post my reply on your forum, I will take time to respond to every query raised by your followers if required.  
 
Will get back to other points later, looking forward to your replies.

Comments by: naeem sheikh On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Dr.Shabbir! All quranic students must be respected( and corrected if needed) ,i respect each quranist especially you like scholar(may Allah bless you/them all) ,and expect your reply to Aastana members in response to their views/rebuttal .At least you should have taken interest to guide them properly (if you find any wrong).Your reply was suppose to meet the same level of knowledge and quranic evidences as Aastana's senior members usually apply to analyze different issues with different angles.  
I really disappointed by your such a childish attempt, you left no room to listen the Aastana members a bit, is it not injustice ? are you not enjoying freedom of thoughts and expressions at the same forum? with best wishes Naeem Sheikh.

Comments by: Universal-Lanati On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Shabbir, you have overlooked some golden words posted to to you earlier  
 
William  
 
Is this the act of someone who claims to be a scholar? Is this the behaviour of role model who claims to have “converted over 16000 (sixteen thousand) non-Muslims, including couple of members of JihadWatch” ??  
 
Shabbir is constantly discriminating against other people and has the audacity to come on Aastana and claim Dr Qamar Zaman has been plagiarising his work? Such a claim from someone whos work is a blatant copy of Mr Parvez’s?  
 
First Shabbir disagrees with what is said, and now he wants translations to be sent to him personally? What so he can forge this too?  
 
Dr Qamar Zaman has not displayed an atoms weight of a grudge against anyone. He is one of the most humble and sincere writers I have ever come across. Even when things were said against him on Ourbeacon, Dr Qamar Zaman remained impartial and gave Shabbir respect by saying “there are so many seniors and better knowledgeable persons like Dr Shabbir and Mr Akhtar Sherazi.”  
 
Shabbir, you should be ashamed of yourself and apologise to Dr Qamar Zaman and the rest of the Aastana team for your ridiculous outburst, lack of respect and inconceivable allegations which lack any substance whatsoever.  
............................................................  
Damon:  
 
Salaam Dear All,  
 
I think you all would be interested in the links posted below.  
 
Please look at these links in the EXACT ORDER that I am posting them to give you all an idea of the history, timeline and development of the QXP project.  
 
http://www.quraninstitute.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=346  
 
http://www.quraninstitute.org/bb/viewtopic.php?t=235  
 
http://www.quraninstitute.org/archives/mission_statement/index.html  
 
The link below is the only online version available of the FIRST EDITION of QXP. The Editorial Page is page number 6. I still say read the above links (in descending order) first before viewing this next link.  
 
http://www.quranicteachings.co.uk/qxp-word.doc  
 
Salaam,  
Damon.  
 
Salaam,  
 
Firstly, I wish to correct a mistake. The editorial page is page number 7 instead of 6. And I mentioned the editorial page to call your attention to Liaquat Ali's name included as the Editor and Technical Monitor. I have a physical paperback copy of this very first edition of the QXP, the credit of which really should go to Brother Liaquat Ali.  
 
Salaam,  
Damon.  
 
Read through it once again please.

Comments by: Universal-Lanati On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
You have stated that Dr Qamar Zaman have poor English, but who is translating your books, who is posting on your forum for you? Don't lie, because its hard for me to believe that a 75 year old man is writing "Lolz" after every mocking post aimed at other scholars. It's even harder to believe a 75 year old is spending time on the net to mock people at something he call a Quraniq forum.

Comments by: Yellow-cow On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Doktor Beer not from Canadda but fro kha jaa da , whay you come here jotti khane and bissti karwane? Think of your skinny followers in your side, they think you heero like anjumann in pakastani movyes, but seeing so many jottia on you they will lost respeckt for you. You shame forgotten?

Comments by: Waqar On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear brothers and sisters,  
The word "Quranist" has been used several time on this forum. I want to know what does this term mean. Do you consider every person who denounces namaz, roza, haj, etc. and mock beard, parda, molvi, etc. to be a Quranist or is he/she the one who lives by the Quranic values?  
Where will you fit Maulana Abul Sattar Edhi who is "mushrik" according to someone's interpretation of word "Maulana"?  
 
Regards,  
Waqar

Comments by: Damon On 26 September 2011Report Abuse
Dear Dr. Qamar Saheb,  
 
If you are watching this thread, PLEASE continue with your good work. You are a magnificent Student and Teacher of The Quran. And PLEASE ignore the people who have NOTHING BETTER TO DO than to try to belittle you. They only do so out of jealousy more than anything else as well as their intimidation of you due to your research and discoveries.  
 
If they spent more time actually studying the Arabic Quran, they wouldn't have all of this free time to spend on the internet displaying their jealousy and intimidation of you. And please do not allow the ignorant and arrogant ones to distract you from your valuable work.  
 
Salaam,  
Damon.

Comments by: moazzam On 27 September 2011
Dear Waqqar! Quranist is one (who so ever) live /observe quranic values(universal divine values/truth) in his life, with out discrimination of religion/culture. As for as Abdussattar Eidhi is concerns up to my knowledge (the data received through media),he is Momin Muslim

Comments by: Mubashir Syed On 28 September 2011Report Abuse
 
Dear All, thought of sharing info as received....  
 
The story was of the oak tree which stood proud and tall and made fun of the grass blades round it. Then came a big storm and uprooted the oak and blew it away. The grass just bent to the wind and did not get blown away. We Muslims have a lesson to learn from this: should we be like the strong oak tree and face the storm or bend like the grass and survive?  
 
 
UNBELIEVABLE AND WRITTEN BY A MUSLIM  
 
 
It sure makes interesting reading... particularly coming from a Pakistani, Dr Farrukh Saleem  
 
 
The writer is the Pakistani Executive Director of the Center for Research and Security Studies, a think tank established in 2007, and an Islamabad-based freelance columnist.  
 
Why are Jews so powerful?  
 
There are only 14 million Jews in the world; seven million in the Americas, five million in Asia, two million in Europe and 100,000 in Africa. For every single Jew in the world there are 100 Muslims.  
 
Yet, Jews are more than a hundred times more powerful than all the Muslims put together. Ever wondered why?  
 
Jesus of Nazareth was Jewish.  
 
Albert Einstein, the most influential scientist of all time and TIME magazine's 'Person of the Century', was a Jew.  
 
Sigmund Freud -- id, ego, and superego -- the father of psychoanalysis was a Jew.  
 
So were Karl Marx, Paul Samuelson and Milton Friedman.  
 
Here are a few other Jews whose intellectual output has enriched the whole humanity:  
 
 
Benjamin Rubin gave humanity the vaccinating needle.  
 
Jonas Salk developed the first polio vaccine.  
 
Albert Sabin developed the improved live polio vaccine.  
 
Gertrude Elion gave us a leukemia fighting drug.  
 
Baruch Blumberg developed the vaccination for Hepatitis B.  
 
Paul Ehrlich discovered a treatment for syphilis (a sexually transmitted disease).  
 
 
Elie Metchnikoff won a Nobel &! nbsp;Prize in infectious diseases.  
 
Bernard Katz won a Nobel Prize in neuromuscular transmission.  
 
Andrew Schally won a Nobel in endocrinology (disorders of the endocrine system; diabetes, hyperthyroidism) .  
 
Aaron Beck founded Cognitive Therapy (psychotherapy to treat mental disorders, depression and phobias).  
 
Gregory Pincus developed the first oral contraceptive pill.  
 
George Wald won a Nobel for furthering our understanding of the human eye.  
 
Stanley Cohen won a Nobel in embryology (study of embryos and their development) .  
 
Willem Kolff came up with the kidney dialysis machine.  
 
 
Over the past 105 years, 14 million Jews have won 15-dozen Nobel Prizes while only three Nobel Prizes have been won by 1.4 billion Muslims (other than Peace Prizes).  
 
 
Why are Jews so powerful?  
 
Stanley Mezor invented the first micro-processing chip.  
 
Leo Szilard developed the first nuclear chain reactor;  
 
Peter Schultz, optical fibre cable;  
 
Charles Adler, traffic lights;  
 
Benno Strauss, Stainless steel;  
 
Isador Kisee, sound movies;  
 
Emile Berliner, telephone microphone;  
 
Charles Ginsburg, videotape recorder.  
 
 
Famous financiers in the business world who belong to Jewish faith include  
 
Ralph Lauren (Polo),  
 
Levis Strauss (Levi's Jeans),  
 
Howard Schultz (Starbuck's) ,  
 
Sergey Brin (Google),  
 
Michael Dell (Dell Computers),  
 
Larry Ellison (Oracle),  
 
Donna Karan (DKNY),  
 
Irv Robbins (Baskins & Robbins) and  
 
Bill Rosenberg (Dunkin Donuts).  
 
 
Richard Levin, President of Yale University, is a Jew. So are Henry Kissinger (American secretary of state), Alan Greenspan (Fed chairman under Reagan, Bush, Clinton and Bush), Joseph Lieberman (US Senator), Madeleine Albright (American secretary of state), Casper Weinberger (American secretary of defense), Maxim Litvinov ( USSR foreign Minister), David Marshal (Singapore's first chief minister), Issac Isaacs (governor-general of Australia ), Benjamin Disraeli (British statesman and author), Yevgeny Primakov (Russian PM), Barry Goldwater (US Senator), Jorge Sampaio (president of Portugal ), John Deutsch (CIA director), Herb Gray (Canadian deputy PM), Pierre Mendes (French PM), Michael Howard (British home secretary), Bruno Kreisky (chancellor of Austria ) and Robert Rubin (American secretary of treasury).  
 
 
 
In the media, famous Jews include Wolf Blitzer (CNN), Barbara Walters (ABC News), Eugene Meyer (Washington Post), Henry Grunwald (editor-in-chief Time), Katherine Graham (publisher of The Washington Post), Joseph Lelyveld (Executive editor, The New York Times), and Max Frankel (New York Times).  
 
 
 
Can you name the most beneficent philanthropist in the history of the world? The name is George Soros, a Jew, who has so far donated a colossal $4 billion most of which has gone as aid to scientists and universities around the world.  
 
 
 
Second to George Soros is Walter Annenberg, another Jew, who has built a hundred libraries by donating an estimated $2 billion.  
 
 
 
At the Olympics, Mark Spitz set a record of sorts by winning seven gold medals.  
 
Lenny Krayzelburg is a three-time Olympic gold medalist.  
 
Spitz, Krayzelburg and Boris Becker (Tennis) are all Jewish.  
 
 
 
Did you know that Harrison Ford, George Burns, Tony Curtis, Charles Bronson, Sandra Bullock, Billy Crystal, Woody Allen, Paul Newman, Peter Sellers, Dustin Hoffman, Michael Douglas, Ben Kingsley, Kirk Douglas, Goldie Hawn, Cary Grant, William Shatner, Jerry Lewis and Peter Falk are all Jewish?  
 
As a matter of fact, Hollywood itself was founded by a Jew. Among directors and producers, Steven Spielberg, Mel Brooks, Oliver Stone, Aaron Spelling (Beverly Hills 90210), Neil Simon (The Odd Couple), Andrew Vaina (Rambo 1/2/3), Michael Man (Starsky andHutch), Milos Forman (One flew over the Cuckoo's Nest), Douglas Fairbanks (The Thief of Baghdad ) and Ivan Reitman (Ghostbusters) are all Jewish.  
 
 
 
So, why are Jews so powerful?  
 
Answer: EDUCATION.  
 
Why are Muslims so powerless?  
 
There are an estimated 1,476,233,470 Muslims on the face of the planet: one billion in Asia, 400 million in Africa, 44 million in Europe and six million in the Americas . Every fifth human being is a Muslim; for every single Hindu there are two Muslims, for every Buddhist there are two Muslims and for every Jew there are one hundred Muslims.  
 
 
 
Ever wondered why Muslims are so powerless?  
 
Here is why: There are 57 member-countries of the Organisation of Islamic Conference (OIC), and all of them put together have around 500 universities; one university for every three million Muslims. The United States has 5,758 universities and India has 8,407.  
 
 
 
In 2004, Shanghai Jiao Tong University compiled an 'Academic Ranking of World Universities' , and intriguingly, not one university from Muslim-majority states was in the top-500.  
 
 
 
As per data collected by the UNDP, literacy in the Christian world stands at nearly 90 per cent and 15 Christian-majority states have a literacy rate of 100 per cent.  
 
 
 
A Muslim-majority state, as a sharp contrast, has an average literacy rate of around 40 per cent and there is no Muslim-majority state with literacy rate of 100 per cent.  
 
 
Some 98 per cent of the 'literates' in the Christian world had completed primary school, while less than 50 per cent of the 'literates' in the Muslim world did the same.  
 
 
 
Around 40 per cent of the 'literates' in the Christian world attended university while no more than two per cent of the 'literates' in the Muslim world did the same.  
 
 
 
Muslim-majority countries have 230 scientists per one million Muslims. The US has 4,000 scientists per million and Japan has 5,000 per million.  
 
In the entire Arab world, the total number of full-time researchers is 35,000 and there are only 50 technicians per one million Arabs. (in the Christian world there are up to 1,000 technicians per one million).  
 
 
 
Furthermore, the Muslim world spends 0.2 per cent of its GDP on research and development, while the Christian world spends around five per cent of its GDP.  
 
 
 
Conclusion: The Muslim world lacks the capacity to produce knowledge!  
 
 
 
Daily newspapers per 1,000 people and number of book titles per million are two indicators of whether knowledge is being diffused in a society.  
 
 
 
In Pakistan, there are 23 daily newspapers per 1,000 Pakistanis while the same ratio in Singapore is 360. In the UK , the number of book  
 
titles per million stands at 2,000 while the same in Egypt is 20.  
 
Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to diffuse knowledge.  
 
Exports of high technology products as a percentage of total exports are an important indicator of knowledge application. Pakistan 's export of high technology products as a percentage of total exports stands at one per cent. The same for Saudi Arabia is 0.3 per cent; Kuwait , Morocco , and Algeria are all at 0.3 per cent, while Singapore is at 58 per cent.  
 
Conclusion: The Muslim world is failing to apply knowledge.  
 
 
Why are Muslims powerless?  
 
.....Because we aren't producing knowledge,  
 
.....Because we aren't diffusing knowledge.,  
 
.....Because we aren't applying knowledge.  
 
 
 
And, the future belongs to knowledge-based societies.  
 
 
 
Interestingly, the combined annual GDP of 57 OIC-countries is under $2 trillion.  
 
America, just by herself, produces goods and services worth $12 trillion;  
 
China $8 trillion,  
 
Japan $3.8 trillion and  
 
Germany $2.4 trillion (purchasing power parity basis).  
 
 
 
Oil rich Saudi Arabia, UAE, Kuwait and Qatar collectively produce goods and services (mostly oil) worth $500 billion;  
 
Spain alone produces goods and services worth over $1 trillion,  
 
Catholic Poland $489 billion and  
 
Buddhist Thailand $545 billion.  
 
 
 
..... (Muslim GDP as a percentage of world GDP is fast declining ).  
 
 
 
So, why are Muslims so powerless?  
 
Answer: Lack of education  
 
 
All we do is to blame everyone else for our multiple failures!!!!!

Comments by: ali.haideer On 11 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear brothers and sisters actually the problem with Mr.Shabber is that he tried to as famous as G.A Perveez and he translated the quran in English even to become famous all around the world but unfortunately his work did not get any feed back as it was only the english version of GA Perveez.  
Perveez always said my work is initiation but Mr Shabeer thought it is the last work on Quran. Mr Shabeer has written un authentic and orthodox things he blams MR QZ although he has done many blunders with the history of islam just for fame one of such example is that he rejects Karbala without any proof.  
He is such a narrow minded person and has thinking of Muhallas that he says a renowned Quranist Mr Niaz Fateh Puri was an atheist, how narrow minded he is.....  
I always read his arguments which are base less not supported by any quranic proofs and he says he has got a command on arabic language thats y he can understand arabic more clearly thatn any body else, but he forgets that the people of arabs speak arabic all the time and have command on arabic but the differ from him in thinking about quran it means his arabic is also poor as he contradicts from those whose mother tongue is arabic.  
Mr Shabeer lost his name and all readers(which were already few in numbers) after QZ revolutionary thoughts than he tried to maintain his status in the world of quranic thoughts by insulting QZ in any way................... this is the only reality about Mr Shabber........  
He is an orthodox Mulan who can only speak against any body he cant do anything good in his life he is totally sick....... His books and translation has got no value after Qz thats why he wants to save his fame...  
Mr Shabeer if u dare reply here with proofs.....  
Please don't delet my coments let all people read this reality as I ws also a reader of Shabeer's books but I saw his actual misson "Fame" by any mean......  
Ali Haideer

Comments by: ali.haideer On 11 October 2011Report Abuse
Dear brothers and sisters actually the problem with Mr.Shabber is that he tried to as famous as G.A Perveez and he translated the quran in English even to become famous all around the world but unfortunately his work did not get any feed back as it was only the english version of GA Perveez.  
Perveez always said my work is initiation but Mr Shabeer thought it is the last work on Quran. Mr Shabeer has written un authentic and orthodox things he blams MR QZ although he has done many blunders with the history of islam just for fame one of such example is that he rejects Karbala without any proof.  
He is such a narrow minded person and has thinking of Muhallas that he says a renowned Quranist Mr Niaz Fateh Puri was an atheist, how narrow minded he is.....  
I always read his arguments which are base less not supported by any quranic proofs and he says he has got a command on arabic language thats y he can understand arabic more clearly thatn any body else, but he forgets that the people of arabs speak arabic all the time and have command on arabic but the differ from him in thinking about quran it means his arabic is also poor as he contradicts from those whose mother tongue is arabic.  
Mr Shabeer lost his name and all readers(which were already few in numbers) after QZ revolutionary thoughts than he tried to maintain his status in the world of quranic thoughts by insulting QZ in any way................... this is the only reality about Mr Shabber........  
He is an orthodox Mulan who can only speak against any body he cant do anything good in his life he is totally sick....... His books and translation has got no value after Qz thats why he wants to save his fame...  
Mr Shabeer if u dare reply here with proofs.....  
Please don't delet my coments let all people read this reality as I ws also a reader of Shabeer's books but I saw his actual misson "Fame" by any mean......  
Ali Haideer

Comments by: Saleem Ahmed Shaikh On 10 July 2014 Edit DeleteReport Abuse
Dr. Shabbir u r very intelligent personality i read ur book criminal of Islam and true story of Islam both books r very good. i humble request to support to Mr. Qamr sahab he is doing very nice job in Isalm i read his books and literature and i think both of u make together and explain about the truth of hadis and other rivayat to all muslim please do not cross each other but united and work together it is my request to Dr. Shabbir.  
Dr. Qamar u r doing very well keep it up we are with u.

»«
OTHER QUESTIONS ON
AASTANABLOG
Salam to all of participants of this Blog......... Can this forum also turn into a meeting of participants residing in a same city?? so that we could jointly do something for our society and DEEN.??? Question by: Adnan Khan On 25/03/2010
 
music is not haraam, listen to Dr Shabbir singing . Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 12/09/2010
 
Dear All, what should be the first plan of action for formation of Islamic state after preaching and drawing room talks ? And what is the right time to take that first step or its already in progess which am unaware of ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 14/09/2010
 
Dear All, What is the motive of UN formation? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 15/09/2010
 
What is the difference between current Imam and an ideal imam ? Does salary of current Imam justify to his services ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 30/09/2010
 
On what principle current golbal economic system is running? why we need a change in economic system? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 30/09/2010
 
How important is it to understand and respect others feelings and develop soft skills ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 06/10/2010
 
Dear All, What is MONEY ?? How did this came into existence? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 10/10/2010
 
Dear All, please share your opinion on Code 19 of Quran by Rashad Khalifah. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 10/10/2010
 
Gold - based Economy -urdu video http://www.metacafe.com/watch/2153513/economic_terrorism_1st_episode/ Question by: alam1162@gmail.com From INDIA (DELHI) On 14/11/2010
 
Respected Team of Aastana blog. Its a long time that there is no new article and book of Dr.Qamar Zaman sahab and Aurangzaib sahab.I am eagerly waiting for new articles and new books. ALLAH-HAFIZ Question by: Rehan_Khan From INDIA (BHOPAL) On 15/11/2010
 
Dear All, how far humans understand functioning of brain? Please share what all you know. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 17/11/2010
 
Do you want to learn arabic ? I cant help you... :-( Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 13/12/2010
 
Dear All, in recent times based on new research we got evidence for existence of universe before BIg Bang. Not sure if Traditional Muslims can find a Ayaat to support this as well ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 02/01/2011
 
Dear All, I found NLP (Neuro Linguistic programming) a good subject to know to program your brain. Please share your opinion on NLP. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 04/01/2011
 
Dear All, i think its not appropriate to call/refer people of traditional understanding as N2I. Request for all participants to please agree and acknowledge this. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 05/01/2011
 
Dear All, what ways can we reach young minds to deliver the fact of fixed laws of Creator? Please share your ideas/opinions for all possible ways. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 19/01/2011
 
Dear All, Prophet Mohammed, his actual name was different as claimed by many scholars? Please share your research based thoughts. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 12/02/2011
 
Dear All, how about Do's and Dont's in sex ??? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 09/03/2011
 
Time for a short break and a bit humor………….please keep sharing. Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 11/03/2011
 
Dear All, How can we justify Rebirth instances/claims ? Or could be another logic speculation of life after death with traces of proof ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 27/03/2011
 
Dear All, Please find SnS Agenda of expenditure on marriage in Asian countries. Maybe a tool to solve many issues of society without any controversies if propagated……… Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 01/04/2011
 
Dear All, should humans donate their body parts like eye's, kidney's etc when they die......which might help others live??? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 30/04/2011
 
Dear Aastana team blog par aik online formate bhe banaein like facebook that online a topic can be discussed......or make a group on facebook with the name of aastana for online discussions. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 29/05/2011
 
All the executive members are requested to please filter the blog time to time and remove irrelevant comments so that it may become easy for casual readers to comprehend the topic easily. Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 18/06/2011
 
How can I print the translation of quran by Dr QZ, b/c that is not in pages and when I am copying it in ms word the words become distorted there....please assist me in this regard....... Question by: ali.haideer From PAKISTAN (LARKANA) On 19/06/2011
 
I woulg like to to understand the meanings of Ayat No 60 to 82 of Sura Al-kahaf(18), Question by: M Aslam From PAKISTAN (GOJRA) On 23/06/2011
 
Is aastana affiliated with Dr. Asrul Islam Syed and JPP? http://theterrorland.blogspot.com/2011/08/army-chief-zaid-hamid-and-his-american.html http://theterrorland.blogspot.com/2011/07/comments-sexual-assault-on-journalist.html Question by: Perwez1 From NORWAY (OSLO) On 04/09/2011
 
Dear Dhulqarnain, are you free from all the Myths and miracles ? Yes or No ? Question by: Mubashir Syed From INDIA (HYDERABAD) On 30/09/2011
 
Watch trailer of Aastana Question by: Nargis From BARBADOS (KIO BATAO?) On 11/06/2012
 
The Quran and A Welfare Society Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 20/10/2012
 
Salaam Dr. Qamar Saheb and Moazzam Saheb. Can you two share with us your understanding and translation of 2/260 and 7/143? Allah Hafiz. Question by: Damon From UNITED STATES (PITTSBURGH) On 16/02/2013
 
Dear Moazzam sb. Al-Rasool came before 1400 yrs. now the situation is entirely changed, it now need badly. pls can u explain the matter? Question by: sajjad hussain From SAUDI ARABIA (JEDDAH) On 19/02/2013
 
AOA. I'm agreed with Dr sahib most of the time but I do have one question for Dr Qamar Zaman sahib. Kindly can you tell me about your control and command on Arabic language. Have you learned this language in your childhood. Thank you Question by: Mansoor From UNITED STATES (DC) On 04/12/2014
 
As i read Bismillah BSM is explained as Quality but not Name.. As i saw on Corpus Quran Bismillah is Bi(in or with) and SMV root word as noun which means glory (noun), highness(noun) why do not consider Bi and SMV in the word - "Bismillah" Question by: reena From UNITED KINGDOM (BLACKBURN) On 30/01/2015
 
Salman alaikum pls explain verse 74:42:43 what is the prayer mentioned Question by: Amir From INDIA (CHENNAI) On 23/02/2015
 
Comments...
Blog Home Question Explorer Member's Area Mission & Vision Join AASTANABLOG
© 2006-2010 Aastana e Research and Understanding Quran. All Rights Reserved
www.aastana.com