|
Join AASTANABLOG
|
| Share your Quranic thoughts, research and knowledge with other's. |
 |
| It's free, easy and only takes a minute. |
|
| Sign up Now |
|
| ARTICLES | | TEEN TALAQ KA BHOOT |
 | Aurangzeb bhai, i read tein talak ka bhoot written by u, excellent job u have done, bt 1 thing is that give a logical answer of the question that aik shaks jo pese lekar talak deta hai wo pher rojo kiyn nahe kar sakta,galati ka koi to azala hoga??? |
 | Comments by: moazzam On Monday, June 07, 2010 |  | |
| Brother Agha sanaullah! slam o alaikum, interesting question,although Aurangzaib bhai will reply more rationaly ,but i also like to share my comments with u if u don't mind.This kind of talaq is known as "khula"and always initiated by woman.In our society the woman files a suit againt her husband.After hearing from both side it is based on the decion of judge,not the will of husband.In my opinion if there would be any chance of rujoo from the woman side then again there would be the chances of same play led to separation due to the tendancy of woman.So this is the vital point to be observed by the judge. before dicision to separation.
| |
| Comments by: aurangzaib On Monday, June 07, 2010 Edit Delete | | |
| Dear Bhai Agha Sanaullah,
The article which you read with due deliberation - and it is source of pleasure for me - deals only with the subject of misinterpretation of Quranic meanings. It clarifies, with the guidance from very noble senior scholars, how the true meanings of Quranic injunctions have been corrupted and to what great extent. And what those injunctions had actually meant to convey.
The article did not deal with the LOGIC BEHIND the divine decree in regard to "Khula' bil maal'. However, upon your 'point of order', the suggestions that we get from the text are : development of dislike between the couple; woman wary of keeping up with the husband's attitude; efforts for reconciliation having failed; insisting upon divorce; husband creating obstacles and treating her desire with high-handedness and disregard; quarrels going on; finally man imposing conditions for releasing the wife from marital bonds; woman so annoyed that instead of contacting the court, thinks feasible to get rid of him by offering some amount of money or valuables; man so inhuman and greedy that he agrees to blackmail her and pinch some of her money in return for her release.
Now in that scenario, is it worthwhile assuming that such a couple would ever like to re-marry? Or a woman, victim of male tyranny, why would she ever think of re-establishing with such a man this closest of human relationship? And why such a black-mailer, greedy husband, be forgiven and allowed another chance to terrorize that woman?
To me, the verdict of the Almighty seems highly just and logical.
This is just a mutual discussion, aimed to substantiate a divine verdict based on profound wisdom.
God bless you.
| |
|
